What “kung fu” actually means, how the kung fu styles fall into families, the nine names you are most likely to meet, how to tell them apart, and how to choose one. Written out in full, with a source behind every claim — and with the limits stated as clearly as the content.
The same map, on video — from the ancient roots to the modern styles, and the masters who carried them.
Read this first. This guide is orientation, not a ranking. It will help you place an unfamiliar style on a map, understand the jargon, and ask better questions of a school. It will not tell you which art is “best” — that question has no general answer, because arts are tools for different problems, bodies and places. And it is not a promise about self-defense. A style name is a starting point, not an outcome.
Start with the word, because almost every misunderstanding follows from it. In Chinese, kung fu (gōngfu) refers to any skill acquired through learning or practice — the patient effort itself, not a specific fighting system.1 It is a compound of “work” or “merit” and a suffix for a person who has attained skill through effort.2 A master chef has kung fu. So does a surgeon.
The fighting systems themselves are wushu, literally “martial art” — from (martial) and (art, skill, method).2 Another term you will see is kuoshu (guóshù), used especially in Taiwan. So when someone asks “what style of kung fu do you do?”, the honest first answer is that kung fu is not a style at all: it is the English umbrella word for Chinese martial arts, borrowed from Cantonese.2 The useful question names a system — Wing Chun, Hung Gar, Shaolin, and so on.
One more distinction, because it trips people up. Since 1949, wushu has also become the name of a modern, judged sport: bare-handed and weapons forms plus full-contact competition, scored against aesthetic criteria.2 Modern sport wushu and a traditional fighting style can share a name and be quite different practices. When you walk into a school, it is worth knowing which of the two you are watching.
Chinese martial arts are not one lineage. They are many fighting styles that developed over the centuries, and they are usually grouped into “families” by shared traits.2 Those traits can be technical (a shared physical exercise, a signature shape), geographic, or philosophical. The common groupings you will meet:
| Grouping | What it sorts by | The label you will hear |
|---|---|---|
| Shaolin-derived | Lineage traced to the Shaolin Monastery and its boxing | Shaolinquan |
| Geography | Where the style developed and is practised | Northern (běiquán) · Southern (nánquán) |
| Mechanics | How force is met: resisted, or received and redirected | Hard · Soft |
| Philosophy / emphasis | Whether training centres on qi cultivation or on muscle and cardiovascular conditioning | Internal (nèijiāquán) · External (wàijiāquán) |
None of these groupings is a law. They are lenses — each reveals something and hides something. A single style can be Southern and hard and external, or Northern and internal, or stubbornly hard to place. The value of the map is that it gives you a place to put an unfamiliar name while you learn what it actually does.
What the historical record does not support is a tidy, ancient tree with a single root. The written record of martial practice is thinner and later than the folklore suggests; the training manuals that survive are mostly from the Ming, Qing and Republican periods, and they document techniques and principles more than they document a clean genealogy.3 Treat the family tree as a working map, not a family Bible.
Five animals carry most of the weight in the Shaolin-derived styles, and they are the animals people mean when they ask about “kung fu styles animals”: tiger for pressing power and grip, crane for balance and evasion, leopard for speed and short penetrating power, snake for precision and control of the opponent, and dragon for structure and whole-body force. They are training methods inside a system rather than separate styles — a Shaolin school may teach all five.
The most useful single split for a beginner is geographic: běiquán (northern boxing) and nánquán (southern boxing).2 The shorthand is real, and you can usually see it in the first ten seconds of a form.
| Northern | Southern | |
|---|---|---|
| Range | Longer; kicks and extended strikes | Close; hands and short power |
| Stance | Higher, more mobile, larger steps | Lower, wider, more rooted |
| Footwork | Leaps, sweeps, full turns | Compact stepping, planted turns |
| Arms | Long, circular, extended | Short, tight, strong “bridges” |
| Examples | Northern Shaolin, Praying Mantis, Baji | Wing Chun, Hung Gar, Choy Li Fut |
Why the difference? Partly geography, partly the conditions the arts were built for. Southern styles grew up in the dense cities and river networks of Guangdong and Fujian, where the ground was tight and the fight was close, and where hand combat also carried local and political meaning.6 Northern styles developed on more open ground, with a longer military and cavalry tradition behind them. That is a reasonable generalisation — and it is exactly that, a generalisation. Plenty of styles ignore it, and the labels describe where a style lives, not how good it is.
Hard and soft describe how forcefully a defender counters the force of an attack.13 A hard technique meets force with force: a block, a stop, a braced impact. A soft technique yields: it receives, redirects or absorbs, using the attacker’s own momentum. Neither is a moral category, and neither wins on its own — each has its applications and its biomechanics of timing.13
Two corrections that save a lot of confusion. First, almost every real style is both. Hard and soft are two ends of one spectrum, and a competent school teaches the pairing, not one side of it. Second, “soft” does not mean weak or slow; a redirected force can be considerably more violent in effect than a blocked one. The word describes mechanics, nothing else.
The last lens is the one most likely to be mystified. External styles (wàijiāquán) concentrate on developing muscle and cardiovascular fitness; internal styles (nèijiāquán) are those focused on qi manipulation and the cultivation of mental and spiritual qualities alongside physical ones.2 Internal arts are also sometimes called “soft styles” for that reason — a label that mixes the two lenses together.13
The internal group is usually named as three: Taijiquan (tai chi), Baguazhang and Xingyiquan, associated with Wudang Mountain in the popular telling. Keep three cautions attached to the label:
This is not a ranking and it is not exhaustive — there are hundreds of recognised styles. It is the short list you are most likely to meet, sorted onto the map above.
| Style | Family | Home | Signature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shaolin | External, Shaolin-derived | Henan (north) | Animal-style exercise; fighting monks evidenced from the Tang dynasty45 |
| Wing Chun | Southern | Guangdong / Hong Kong | Close range, centreline, vertical fist, chain-punching67 |
| Hung Gar | Southern | Guangdong | Low horse stance, deep rooted power, strong bridges8 |
| Choy Li Fut | Southern | Guangdong | Wide range, long-arm and short-range methods combined9 |
| Praying Mantis (northern) | Northern | Shandong | Fast continuous hand trapping; the mantis-hook hand10 |
| Baji | Northern | Hebei | Short, explosive power; elbows, shoulders and knees11 |
| Tai Chi (Taijiquan) | Internal | Wenxian, Henan | Slow, relaxed, circular movement led by breath14 |
| Baguazhang | Internal | Northern China | Continuous walking of the circle; palm changes12 |
| Xingyiquan | Internal | Northern China | Straight-line, aggressive; five-element actions12 |
A note on the internal three. Taijiquan is the most widely practised and the most studied: it was inscribed by UNESCO in 2020 on the Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity, characterised there as relaxed, circular movement working with breath regulation, resting on five steps and eight techniques, and now passed on through both clan and master–apprentice teaching.14 Baguazhang and Xingyiquan are its usual companions in the internal family, though practitioners argue about the boundaries.
On Shaolin specifically, the history is more interesting than the legend. The fighting monks of the Shaolin Monastery appear in the historical record as early as the Tang dynasty (618–907), evidenced in the monastery’s own stone inscriptions — which is a documented history of combat practice, not a myth of invincible warrior-monks.4 What “Shaolin” means as a style name today is looser: a whole family of boxing traditions, inside and outside the temple, that claim the connection.5
You do not need to know the history to recognise a style. Watch a form for sixty seconds and read four things: stance (high and mobile, or low and rooted), range (long, or close), footwork (leaps and sweeps, or compact planted steps), and the shape that keeps repeating (the signature).
| If you see… | …you are probably looking at |
|---|---|
| A low, wide horse stance with short explosive hand techniques and a lot of rooting | A southern style — Hung Gar, Choy Li Fut, or a southern Shaolin branch |
| A square-on close-range stance, hands on the centreline, tight chain-punches | Wing Chun |
| Long extended stances, high kicks, leaps and full-body turns | A northern style — Northern Shaolin, Praying Mantis, or similar |
| Very fast, continuous, whipping hand techniques with a hooked “mantis” hand | Northern Praying Mantis |
| Short-range, whole-body explosive power delivered through elbow and shoulder | Baji |
| Slow, continuous, circular movement, no impact, breath visibly led | Taijiquan |
| Continuous walking around a circle, palms changing as the body turns | Baguazhang |
| Straight-line, driving forward steps with a small number of repeated actions | Xingyiquan |
Two warnings about reading a style from the outside. First, form is not fighting: a beautiful form tells you what the school values aesthetically, not how it trains application. Second, many schools teach several arts at once, so what you see may be a blend. Use the tells to orient yourself, then ask what the class actually does.
The honest answer is that the teacher and the training matter more than the name on the door. A good Wing Chun school beats a bad Baji school, every time, for every purpose. So the decision has three parts — the art, the teacher, and the fit — and only the third is really about you.
Questions worth asking before you commit to anything:
And the fit questions you can only answer yourself: does the movement suit your body and age? Southern styles ask for deep stances; northern styles for mobility and range; the internal arts for patience and subtlety. Do you want the social world of a traditional school, or a sport-and-fitness culture, or a simple self-defense class? All three are legitimate. Pick the one you will actually keep attending.
Red flags, in no particular order: guaranteed results; a claim that only their line has the “real” art; secrecy about basics or fees; discouraging questions; and any promise about outcomes in a real confrontation. Confidence in a school shows up as willingness to be observed and questioned, not as mystique.
| The mistake | What is really happening | The fix |
|---|---|---|
| Choosing a style name off a poster | Choosing a brand, not a place to train | Visit. Watch. Ask. Judge the class, not the logo. |
| Judging an art by its competition rules | Confusing a rule-set with a whole system | Remember that every art looks limited when it is wearing someone else’s rules. |
| Expecting “internal” to be gentle or mystical | Reading a training emphasis as mysticism | Expect slow, patient, hard-to-see work — not magic, and not less effort. |
| Assuming “traditional” means effective | Age is not evidence | Ask what the training does, week to week, and how it tests it. |
| Collecting styles instead of training one | Breadth mistaken for depth | Pick one and stay long enough to find out what it is. |
The free monthly Modern Combat Live Seminar is where mechanics get pressure-tested live — and where you can bring the styles you are considering and your questions about them. It costs nothing, and there is nothing to buy to attend.
What each skill is, where it is used or scored, and where it breaks down. This is a description for understanding — not instruction, and not a promise about anyone’s safety.
What it is — A short-range straight punch thrown from a vertical fist along the body’s centreline, delivered as a continuous alternating chain so each strike covers the return of the other. The whole method assumes hands already on the centreline and a bridge to the opponent’s arm.
Where it is used — The core of Wing Chun’s close-quarters approach; it appears in the hand forms (Siu Nim Tau, Chum Kiu) and is drilled with a partner in sticky-hands (chi sau) practice.
Where it breaks down — Mistaught as a fast flurry with no structure. Thrown without maintaining the centreline and forward pressure it becomes weak and off-line, and because its reach is short by design it needs an entry or bridge before it means anything.
Source: Wikipedia — Wing Chun
What it is — A deep, wide, rooted horse stance from which short, heavy hand techniques are delivered, paired with ‘bridge’ contacts that connect to and control the opponent’s arm. Power is built from the ground up through a low, stable base.
Where it is used — Foundational to southern Hung Gar; the stance underpins the style’s heavy strikes, its conditioning sets, and the leverage used for throwing over the lead leg.
Where it breaks down — Held statically for its own sake. The stance is a base for structure and leverage, not a pose to be endured; schools can over-emphasise long, low holding and never apply the bridges against real resistance.
Source: Wikipedia — Hung Ga; Horse stance
What it is — Extended, circular arm techniques that whip out at longer range, deliberately combined with southern short-range hand methods. The system mixes northern circular power and agile footwork with southern close-range technique.
Where it is used — Central to Choy Li Fut’s wide curriculum of long and short punches, kicks, sweeps and takedowns, founded in 1836 by Chan Heung.
Where it breaks down — A big swing is visible from far away if it is thrown without set-up; the long-range techniques only work when the footwork and timing actually close the distance.
Source: Wikipedia — Choy Li Fut
What it is — A hook formed by one to three fingers that can deflect, hook onto and adhere to an opponent’s limb, or strike with the back of the wrist. It works on the style’s ‘remove something, add something’ principle: clear a gap, then attack through it.
Where it is used — The signature of Northern Praying Mantis, which is known for speed and continuous attacks driven by continuous wrist and arm work.
Where it breaks down — Treated as a static trapping grip. The hook is a whip-like deflection and adhere, not a hold, and schools that freeze it into a pose lose the continuous motion the style is built around.
Source: Wikipedia — Northern Praying Mantis
What it is — Explosive, short-range power delivered through the eight ‘extremities’ — fist, forearm, elbow, shoulder, hip, thigh, knee and foot — especially elbow and shoulder strikes at touching distance. Power is issued through the whole body rather than the arm alone.
Where it is used — The defining feature of Bajiquan, historically taught to bodyguards; the style is still known as the ‘bodyguard style’.
Where it breaks down — Taught as an isolated arm motion it produces no force, because the power depends on structure and ground contact. Its extremely short range also needs an entry before it can land.
Source: Wikipedia — Bajiquan
What it is — A two-person sensitivity drill in which partners keep contact and practise yielding, redirecting and neutralising force instead of resisting it. It trains the ability to feel the direction and strength of another person’s movement.
Where it is used — The bridge between solo form and application in the internal arts (tai chi, baguazhang, xingyiquan, yiquan), and also a competitive event that involves contact but no strikes.
Where it breaks down — Reduced to a cooperative pushing game. Without progressive pressure and honest resistance, push-hands teaches compliance rather than sensitivity.
Source: Wikipedia — Pushing hands
What it is — Pre-arranged solo sequences of techniques, in many Shaolin-derived traditions built around animal imagery such as the tiger, crane, leopard, snake and dragon. Forms are the memory and conditioning vehicle of a style.
Where it is used — The main way techniques are transmitted and preserved, and the backbone of most kung fu curricula and of modern wushu competition.
Where it breaks down — A form is not a fight. A polished routine shows what a school values aesthetically, not how it trains application, and many schools teach several arts at once so what you see may be a blend.
Source: Wikipedia — Shaolin Kung Fu
What it is — Continuous walking around a circle while the orientation of the palms and the body changes, used to train footwork, turning and redirection from every angle rather than on a line.
Where it is used — The defining practice of baguazhang, attributed to Dong Haichuan; the walking is the training, with palm changes as the repeating unit.
Where it breaks down — Done as aimless circling. The footwork only becomes usable when it is tied to contact and reactions, which many schools leave out.
Source: Wikipedia — Baguazhang
| The claim you hear | What the sources actually show |
|---|---|
| Kung fu is one martial art. | Kung fu (gōngfu) is not a style at all — it means any skill earned through long practice, and a chef or surgeon has it too. The fighting systems are wushu, and under that umbrella there are hundreds of recognised Chinese styles, most grouping into a handful of regional traditions. |
| All Chinese martial arts came from the Shaolin Monastery. | Folklore, not history. Chinese martial arts are documented centuries before Shaolin was founded in 495 AD, and the 1784 Boxing Classic’s claim that boxing originated there is described in reference sources as a misconception. |
| An Indian monk, Bodhidharma, founded Shaolin kung fu. | Not established. The idea spread in the 20th century from a 17th-century legend that is regarded as debunked, and there is no historical evidence that Bodhidharma taught martial arts at Shaolin. |
| Internal styles can’t fight. | The internal/external split describes training emphasis — qi cultivation and mental work versus muscle and cardiovascular conditioning — not combat effectiveness. Taijiquan was created as a martial art, and push-hands is a combat-training drill. |
| Sport wushu forms are the same thing as fighting. | Modern wushu was developed from 1949 as a standardised sport, and its taolu routines are judged on aesthetic criteria. The full-contact fighting side of wushu is sanda, a separate discipline with its own rules. |
| A ‘traditional’ or older style is automatically more effective. | Age is not evidence. Effectiveness depends on how a school trains — application work, progressive contact, pressure-testing — not on how old the name is, and many traditional schools never do application practice at all. |
| Northern styles fight at long range and Southern styles at close range — always. | A useful generalisation, not a law. The labels describe where a style developed and its typical stance and range, and plenty of styles sit across them or ignore the rule entirely. |
| There is one ‘true’ lineage and modern versions are fakes. | Lineages are more contested than the folklore suggests. Wing Chun, for example, has at least eight distinct lineages with different founder stories, and the surviving written record of Chinese martial practice is thinner and later than the legends imply. |
Robert Graham writes from inside MCMA — Modern Combat Martial Arts, home of the White Lotus System, where this material is taught live. This is a reading, not a promise: every claim above is tied to the sources listed, and where the record is thin the text says so.
The free monthly Modern Combat Live Seminar is where the mechanics get pressure-tested live. Nothing to buy, nothing to attend — just the session and your questions about the styles you are considering.
Register for the free seminar Back to the guide page